Comments for TOROZ

Comment on SWTOR Patch 1.1.4 notes by David H

David H — Wed, 22 Feb 2012 14:47:00 +0000

Most welcome

Comment on SWTOR Patch 1.1.4 notes by Fake

Fake — Wed, 22 Feb 2012 14:35:00 +0000

Thank you for posting this! I think that it is rediculous that SWTOR doesnt at least give public viewing access to PT forums to be able to see whats coming up. As far as the fixes… obviously to much attention being paid to minor but significant (should have been done before alpha fixes) details rather than seeing the “big picture” Thanks again.

Comment on SWTOR Patch 1.1.4 notes by a smarter person

a smarter person — Wed, 22 Feb 2012 14:35:00 +0000

what possible negatives are there? while huge positives like convinience and broader gameplay

Comment on SWTOR Patch 1.1.4 notes by a smart person.

a smart person. — Wed, 22 Feb 2012 14:20:00 +0000

then you are stupid. dual specs is retarded and should never had been made in the first place

Comment on SWTOR Patch 1.1.4 notes by Demiize

Demiize — Wed, 22 Feb 2012 13:32:00 +0000

I really hope they do. It would be nice to have a dps option as a healer or tank.

Comment on SWTOR Patch 1.1.4 notes by Demiize

Demiize — Wed, 22 Feb 2012 13:31:00 +0000

Actually it is
posed:Puzzle or perplex (someone) with a question or problem

Comment on SWTOR Patch 1.1.4 notes by Tenebraé

Tenebraé — Wed, 22 Feb 2012 12:53:00 +0000

It’s UI options to make it easier to see when an ability has finished its CD/when the global CD is completed. they’re not ‘messing with it’ they’re giving us the option – if you don’t like the new choices, don’t use them

Comment on Busting SWTOR bugs: “everything else is secondary” by Bkweatherford

Bkweatherford — Wed, 22 Feb 2012 12:51:00 +0000

enough said.

Comment on SWTOR Patch 1.1.4 notes by Tenebraé

Tenebraé — Wed, 22 Feb 2012 12:46:00 +0000

isn’t error 9000 disconnection due to bad connection? or is that 9001 . . .

Comment on SWTOR Patch 1.1.4 notes by Benoitgdsp

Benoitgdsp — Wed, 22 Feb 2012 12:43:00 +0000

They’re going to make the double spec soon.

Comment on SWTOR Patch 1.1.4 notes by Bkweatherford

Bkweatherford — Wed, 22 Feb 2012 12:42:00 +0000

you forgot a “T” is the word posted.nice job.

Comment on SWTOR Patch 1.1.4 notes by wiingfang

wiingfang — Wed, 22 Feb 2012 12:31:00 +0000

your guardian is tank spec , although tank spec has loads of charges and stuns and utility , it lacks alot of damage , unlike assasin tanks who have more towards damage , that is why u you probably lost. you could try a diferent spec.

Comment on SWTOR: Australia and New Zealand launch confirmed! by M_dawg

M_dawg — Wed, 22 Feb 2012 12:04:00 +0000

I got my copy for 49$ and was playing that day, as I had launcher installed from beta. Cant wait for Aussie servers!!!

Comment on SWTOR Patch 1.1.4 notes by Gavin

Gavin — Wed, 22 Feb 2012 12:03:00 +0000

they need to fix ERROR 9000………….

Comment on It’s official: SWTOR launches in Australia/NZ on March 1st by Ayrts1

Ayrts1 — Wed, 22 Feb 2012 11:45:00 +0000

man i have 2 50′s and 30+ did they say u can only transfer 1 toon or all

Comment on Stephen Reid Q&A: Summary Transcript by Gavin

Gavin — Wed, 22 Feb 2012 11:17:00 +0000

really happy about the decision for local servers AND free transfers. I have newfound respect through this decision alone. I hope it has set the trend for major MMO releases in the future. Hats off to BW and EA.

Comment on SWTOR Patch 1.1.4 notes by Glorion

Glorion — Wed, 22 Feb 2012 11:05:00 +0000

I have trouble 1v1ing on my guardian in tank pvp spec against a shadow
in tank pvp spec…I’m half BM geared, he’s half champ geared. I think thats a bit dodgey, but meh.

I dont really care about 1v1s. They mean nothing to me. I think that the
Guardian dps output in Defense spec is too low though (it effects PvP
and PvE). It’s not “oh my gawd, we need buff nao!” low, but yeah.

In PvP as a guardian, I play more like I do as on my commando healer.
Looking at raid frames, seeing who the focus target is, then doing my
best to save their ass.

As for brackets, I’ve leveled my commando from level 10-40 using WZs, class quests, space missions. He’s rank 40 valor. I reckon I have won probably 8 of every 10 games, and I am certainly not an anchor, even at the lower levels. People need to understand that at level 10, you dont stand in the middle of a fight, hell, you should be guarding a point, letting other people fight in the action, till you’re stronger. I dont want to hear “Oh but I’ll just get stomped and die on the point easily” – null point. People need to learn how to play as a weaker defender – protip – you dont need to be ON the point, in the open. You just get DPSed down.

Comment on SWTOR Patch 1.1.4 notes by Nos

Nos — Wed, 22 Feb 2012 09:27:00 +0000

What about rhythm augmentation droid?! When are the going to fix it? #Firstworldproblems

Comment on SWTOR Patch 1.1.4 notes by Nos

Nos — Wed, 22 Feb 2012 09:23:00 +0000

Warriors can hold their own against almost any class. Obviously at level 10 you are going to be at a disadvantage, but that is the choice you make when you join a warzone at level 10. Personally, I have topped the scoreboard in a warzone at level 10, multiple times.

Advanced spec is not advanced spec. Advanced spec is advanced class. Which means that it is part of your class selection. You cannot change from a Sith Warrior to a Sith Inquisitor after you made the character, can you?

Comment on SWTOR Patch 1.1.4 notes by Nos

Nos — Wed, 22 Feb 2012 09:15:00 +0000

Actually, No one is being accepted with a hyphen. It removes the ambiguity of “no one” in certain situations.

So, when “No-one” is the subject of the sentence, a hyphen is acceptable. However, “No one person is…” would not have a hyphen.

Get it? Have a nice day.